Recommended
★★★★★
4.8 | 2,847 Reviews
Luxe Korean Under-Eye Balm
  • Adenosine Wrinkle-Core Complex
  • Korean MFDS Recognized Active
  • Over 2,800+ Happy Customers
  • 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Luxe Korean Under-Eye Balm CHECK AVAILABILITY >>
Luxe Korean Under-Eye Balm $69.90 $34.95
Claim Your FREE Product →
An Open Letter From One Tired-Looking Woman to Another:

I'm 56. I Stopped Wearing Concealer After 11 Days of This Korean Balm. Here's What's Actually In It (And Why La Mer Doesn't Use It).

Hero image — add your image in theme editor

5 min read

If you're over 45 and you've tried everything for your under-eyes (the $180 La Mer, the $40 RoC, the cucumber slices, the ice rollers, the late-night Sephora orders you regret in the morning), this letter is for me from two years ago. Read it before you buy another eye cream that doesn't work.

My name is Margaret. I'm 56. I taught fourth grade in Cleveland for 31 years before I retired in 2023.

I want to tell you about the nine years I spent looking tired in every photograph my family took of me.

It started somewhere around 47. The kind of thing you don't notice on a Tuesday but suddenly notice in a Christmas card photo from your sister-in-law in January. The puffiness under my eyes. The dark circles I'd never had in my 30s. The crepey little texture that started showing up when I smiled and stayed there after I stopped.

I did what every woman my age does. I bought eye cream.

Then I bought another eye cream. Then a serum. Then the $180 La Mer because the woman at Sephora said it was "the gold standard." Then a peptide thing from Ulta. Then a depuffing roller my niece swore by. Then a Korean snail mucin essence I saw on Instagram at 11pm and bought before I could think about it.

Nine years. Nine years of buying things, hoping, watching nothing change, and putting on more concealer the next morning.

Then in February of this year, my daughter sent me an article. And everything changed.

I'll tell you what was in the article in a minute. First, I have to tell you about the concealer.


The Concealer Story (Or: How I Wasted Eight Minutes Every Morning for Nine Years)

Here's what my mornings looked like from age 47 to 55.

Wake up. Pee. Coffee. Sit at the bathroom mirror with the magnifying side flipped out. Look at the puffiness. Sigh. Open the concealer. Dab it under the left eye. Dab it under the right eye. Blend with the ring finger because some YouTube woman said the ring finger is gentler. Look in the mirror.

Fine. For about an hour.

Then I'd be at the grocery store, or picking up the grandkids from school, or talking to a parent of one of my old students who recognized me at Target. And I'd catch my reflection in the freezer aisle glass.

Image placeholder

The concealer had cracked into the lines under my eyes. Already. By 10:15 in the morning.

So I'd go home and add more. And by 1pm it had cracked again. By the time my husband got home from work, the under-eye area looked worse than it would have if I'd just left it alone in the morning.

I started avoiding photos. Then I started angling my face away from cameras. Then I asked my daughter to please not post the Easter pictures on Facebook. Then I stopped going to my book club because the lighting in Linda's living room was the kind of overhead lighting that turns under-eye bags into canyons.

Nine years of this.

And here's the part I really want you to understand. It wasn't the puffiness that broke me. It was the slow shrinking of my own life. The events I skipped. The photos I deleted before anyone could see them. The "you look tired today, Mrs. Henderson" from a fourth-grader on a Monday morning when I'd slept eight hours.

A friend of mine has a beautiful old bicycle in her garage. Italian, from the 1970s, leather seat, the whole thing. It's been sitting there for fifteen years. The first time I saw it, I asked her why she didn't ride it. She said, "Oh, the gears rusted. It still looks pretty in the corner."

That's what was happening to my under-eyes. The structure was still there. The bones, the muscles, everything was still working. But the surface had rusted, and the rust was spreading every year, and pretty soon I was going to be the woman in the corner of every family photo who "still looked pretty," in the way you say it about something nobody uses anymore.

I didn't want to be the bicycle in the corner.

So when my daughter sent me that article in February, I read it twice.

Concealer story image — add your image in theme editor

Raise Your Hand If Any of This Sounds Like You

Before I tell you what was in the article, I need you to do something for me.

Read through this list. Be honest. And see how many of these you've felt in the last six months.

You wake up in the morning and the first thing you do is check the puffiness under your eyes before you check anything else.
Your concealer cracks into the lines under your eyes by lunch. Sometimes by mid-morning. You've stopped buying the expensive ones because the cheap ones crack the same way.
A coworker, a niece, a stranger at the supermarket, or a fourth-grader has asked you "are you tired?" in the last month. You weren't.
You've quietly stopped taking selfies. Or you take them, look at them, delete them, and then pretend the moment didn't happen.
You've turned down a glass of wine at dinner because you're convinced wine is what's making your eyes look puffy in the morning. (It isn't, by the way. I'll get to that.)
You have a drawer with three or more eye creams in it. At least one of them cost over $80. None of them did anything.
You've Googled "under-eye filler near me" in the last year. Maybe you booked a consult. Maybe you canceled it.
You've started avoiding the magnifying side of your bathroom mirror.
You've made peace with most of aging, but the under-eyes are the one part you couldn't quite accept.

If you raised your hand even once, this letter is for you. If you raised your hand three or more times, I want you to read every word of what's coming next, because you are exactly the woman I was in February before my daughter sent me that article.

What was in the article? It was about a problem nobody had ever explained to me before.

A problem with four parts.

Raise your hand section image — add your image in theme editor

What Was In the Article (Or: The Four-Part Problem Nobody Had Bothered to Explain to Me in Nine Years of Buying Eye Cream)

The article was written by a Korean cosmetic chemist. My daughter found it on a skincare forum she follows. It was technical and a little dry and I had to read it twice to understand it, but the part that hit me was this.

Under-eye aging is not one problem. It is four problems. And every product I'd ever bought only fixed one of them.

That was the sentence that made me put my coffee down.

Nine years of throwing money at La Mer and RoC and the snail mucin and the depuffing roller, and the reason none of it had worked wasn't because I was buying the wrong brands. It was because every single one of those products was attacking one quarter of the problem and ignoring the other three quarters. So even when something worked a little, the other three drivers kept dragging the result backward.

Here's what the four drivers actually are.

Driver 1: Your collagen scaffold is thinning by 1% a year after 40.

The skin under your eyes is held up by a collagen scaffold the way a tent is held up by tent poles. After 40, those tent poles get thinner by about 1% every year. By 56 that's a 16% loss. The skin literally has nothing structural to hold its shape, which is what causes the crepey texture and the way fine lines stay there after you stop smiling.

Most eye creams have zero collagen-signaling actives. They're just moisturizers with a fancy label. They cannot fix Driver 1. Doesn't matter what they cost.

Driver 2: The skin under your eyes is ten times thinner than the rest of your face.

Ten. Times. Thinner. I had no idea. The chemist's article said the under-eye skin loses water about twice as fast as the skin on your forehead, which means heavy creams sit on top, sweat off by lunchtime, and you're back where you started by 1pm. This is why the La Mer felt great for an hour and then disappeared.

Driver 3: The dark circles aren't pigment. They're blood.

This one made me say the word "huh" out loud at the kitchen table. Slow microcirculation under the thin under-eye skin causes blood and oxidized iron to pool there, and what looks like dark "pigment" is actually a vascular pooling issue showing through skin so thin it's almost translucent. Brightening serums target surface melanin. They cannot reach the pooling because the pooling is underneath the surface they're treating. Twelve years of vitamin C serums for nothing.

Driver 4: After menopause, your skin's barrier collapses.

Your body's estrogen drops in your late 40s and early 50s. Estrogen is what keeps the lipid barrier of your skin intact. When it drops, the barrier collapses. This is the reason vitamin C suddenly burns when it never used to, the reason retinol started flaking my skin off in week two, and the reason every fragranced cream I'd ever loved in my 30s now stings the second I put it on.

It's also the reason wine isn't the cause of your puffy mornings. (See, I told you I'd come back to that.) It's not the wine. It's the barrier. The wine is just a small alcohol load on top of skin that no longer has the lipid layer to handle it.

Now read the next sentence twice.

If your eye cream only fixes one of these four drivers, you will see exactly the result I saw for nine years. Nothing. Because the other three drivers are still dragging the result backward every single day, faster than the one fix can pull it forward.

This is the part nobody had ever told me. And the moment I understood it, every single one of my failed eye creams suddenly made sense.

So I went looking for one product that fixed all four.

Four drivers section image — add your image in theme editor

What I Refuse to Put Near My Face Anymore (And What You Should Throw Out Tonight)

Once I understood the four drivers, I went into my bathroom drawer with a trash bag.

I am not exaggerating. A trash bag.

I pulled every eye cream, every serum, every "anti-aging" tube I had bought in the last four years and lined them up on the counter. Then I went down the row, one by one, and asked the same question. Does this fix all four drivers, or is it making things worse?

Most of them were making things worse. Here's what went in the bag.

The $180 La Mer Eye Concentrate.

I loved this jar. I had babied this jar. I had felt fancy every time I unscrewed the lid.

Here is what's in it. Algae extract, mineral oil, petrolatum, lanolin, and a pile of fragrance compounds. Zero collagen-signaling actives. Zero adenosine. Zero anything that fixes Driver 1. The whole thing is a heavy occlusive moisturizer with a designer label. You're paying $180 for the lid.

Does it feel nice? Yes. Does it fix any of the four drivers? No.

In the bag.

Anything With Retinol.

I had three of these. The dermatologist's office sample. A drugstore one. A hyped-up Instagram one in a black tube.

Retinol works by accelerating cell turnover, which strips the lipid barrier on its way through your skin. For a 30-year-old with intact estrogen, that's annoying but tolerable. For a 56-year-old whose barrier already collapsed at menopause? Retinol is pouring gasoline on a fire and calling it skincare. It makes Driver 4 actively worse. Every single time you apply it.

I threw all three in the bag. I almost lit them on fire.

Vitamin C Serums.

I had two. The "brightening" one I bought to fix my dark circles, and a fancier one I bought because the first one didn't work.

Vitamin C is a surface-level antioxidant. It cannot reach Driver 3 (the vascular pooling underneath the skin) because the pooling is underneath the surface vitamin C is treating. You could pour the whole bottle on your face and it wouldn't reach the layer where the dark circles are actually happening. It also stings a barrier-compromised face, which means it's making Driver 4 worse while accomplishing nothing on Driver 3.

In the bag.

Cucumber Slices, Ice Rollers, Frozen Spoons, and Tea Bags.

I am embarrassed by how much time I spent on these.

These all do the same thing. They cause temporary vasoconstriction. The blood vessels under your eyes shrink for about 20 minutes, the puffiness goes down a little, and then everything returns to baseline because nothing was actually treated. It is the skincare equivalent of holding your breath to fix asthma.

I threw the cucumber slices out, but I kept the ice roller because it feels nice on a hot day. That's all it is. A nice feeling. Not a treatment.

Now here is the part I want you to read carefully.

If you have any of these things in your bathroom right now, I am not going to tell you to throw them away tonight. That is your call.

But I am going to tell you this. Every morning you put one of those products on your face is a morning you are either doing nothing for your under-eyes or actively making them worse. Nine years of mornings is what I gave to those products. I would like the nine years back. I cannot have them.

You can still have yours.

Here is what I replaced all of it with.


What I Replaced All of It With

Product reveal image — add your image in theme editor

The Korean chemist's article mentioned an ingredient I'd never heard of. Adenosine. It's the only anti-wrinkle active officially recognized by the Korean MFDS, which is the Korean equivalent of the FDA. It's been on their approved list since 2014.

The FDA doesn't classify adenosine. La Mer doesn't put it in the $180 jar. Lancôme doesn't. RoC doesn't. Twelve years of Korean dermatologists using it on women in Seoul, and almost no American eye cream had it.

I went looking for one that did.

I found it on a Wednesday afternoon while my husband watched golf in the next room. A small American brand called Luxe Cosmetics had built a Korean-formulated balm around adenosine and four supporting actives, each one targeting a different driver. They called the system the Adenosine Wrinkle-Core Complex.

I almost didn't order it. The website looked too small, the price was suspiciously low ($34.95 with a buy-one-get-one), and I had been burned enough times that "small Korean balm online" set off every skeptical instinct I had.

But I had a trash bag of failed eye creams in my garage and nothing left to lose. I clicked the BOGO. I added the free shipping. I closed the laptop and didn't tell my husband because I was embarrassed.

The package arrived four days later. The tube was smaller than I expected. The packaging was simple. There was no fancy lid.

I unscrewed it that night, swiped it under both eyes, and went to bed expecting nothing.

Eleven days later, my husband asked me what I was doing differently.


The Five Things in the Tube (And What Each One Actually Does)

Image placeholder

Before I tell you what happened on day 11, you need to understand what's in the balm. Because every single ingredient is doing one specific job that maps to one specific driver.

Here is the version that finally made sense to me.

Ingredient 1: Adenosine

The Driver 1 Fix

This is the hero of the whole thing. Adenosine is a naturally occurring molecule that binds to receptors on the cells under your skin and signals them to produce more collagen. It is the only anti-wrinkle active officially recognized by the Korean MFDS, which approved it as a functional ingredient back in 2014. It works through a completely different pathway than retinol, which means it does not strip your barrier on the way through. No flaking. No burning. No "adjustment period." It just sits there and tells your skin to rebuild the scaffold that has been thinning by 1% every year since you turned 40.

If you only remember one ingredient from this letter, remember this one. Adenosine is what almost no American eye cream has, and it is the reason almost no American eye cream works on women over 45.

Ingredient 2: Sodium Hyaluronate

The Driver 2 Fix

This is hyaluronic acid in its low-molecular-weight form, which means it actually penetrates instead of sitting on the surface like the version in most drugstore creams. It holds about 1,000 times its weight in water and delivers it directly into the dehydrated under-eye layer where Driver 2 lives. Sodium hyaluronate is the irrigation system. Without it, every other active in the tube has nothing to work with.

This is why the balm absorbs in about eight seconds instead of sitting on top like a heavy cream.

Ingredient 3: Niacinamide

The Driver 3 Fix

Remember when I told you the dark circles aren't actually pigment, they're vascular pooling showing through translucent skin? Niacinamide addresses both halves of that problem. It blocks melanosome transfer, which handles whatever surface pigment exists. And it supports the microcirculation underneath, which is what causes the actual pooling.

Twelve years of vitamin C did nothing for my dark circles. Two weeks of niacinamide did everything.

Ingredient 4: Argan Oil

The Driver 4 Fix, Part One

This is the ingredient I was most surprised by. Argan oil is the only single ingredient in the formula with a published clinical trial in menopausal women specifically. The trial showed measurable improvement in skin elasticity and barrier function in women between 40 and 65. It is the closest thing to barrier rescue that exists for menopausal skin, and it is the reason this balm works on faces that have stopped responding to everything else.

If your barrier collapsed somewhere in the last decade, argan oil is the ingredient your face has been begging for and not getting.

Ingredient 5: Bisabolol

The Driver 4 Fix, Part Two

Bisabolol is derived from chamomile. It calms inflammation, reduces redness, and quietly finishes the barrier-rebuilding work that argan oil starts. It is also the reason the balm doesn't sting on a face that has rejected every fragranced cream in the last decade. Zero fragrance. Zero alcohol. Zero essential oils. The bisabolol is what makes the formula safe for women whose skin attacks itself the moment something irritating touches it.

Now Look At What This Adds Up To.

Five ingredients. Each one mapped to one of the four drivers. Adenosine for the collagen scaffold. Sodium hyaluronate for the dehydration. Niacinamide for the pigment and the pooling. Argan oil and bisabolol for the menopausal barrier collapse.

This is the only eye treatment I have ever held in my hand that fixes all four drivers in one swipe. Not three out of four. Not the easy ones. All four.

I'm not a chemist. I'm a retired teacher who reads twice when something is technical. But I have been to enough Sephora counters to know nothing on those shelves comes close to this stack at this price.


STOP. Before You Go Looking For This On Amazon.

I know what some of you are doing right now. You read "adenosine" two sections ago and you opened a new tab and you typed "adenosine eye cream" into Amazon to see if there's a cheaper version.

Don't.

I did the same thing. Three days after I ordered Luxe, before my package even arrived, I went down that rabbit hole and almost canceled my order. There are about forty Amazon products with adenosine on the label, most of them under $20, and I almost bought one of those instead.

Here is why I did not, and why you should not either.

Adenosine on a label means almost nothing. The dose matters. The pH the formula sits at matters. The other ingredients it is paired with matter. Most of those Amazon products use adenosine at levels too low to do anything measurable, paired with cheap surfactants and fragrances that re-trigger the exact barrier collapse in Driver 4 you are trying to fix. You spend $14, you get worse skin, you assume "adenosine doesn't work," and you go back to La Mer.

The same thing is true at Sephora. The same thing is true at Ulta. The same thing is true on the eight other DTC skincare sites I checked before clicking buy on Luxe.

The reason this formula works is not just that it contains adenosine. It is that adenosine is paired with the four other ingredients I just walked you through, at the doses they need to be at, in a balm format that sits on the skin long enough to deliver them. Take any one of those things away and the whole stack falls apart.

So please. Do not go shopping for the cheap version. The cheap version is what put nine years of failed eye creams in my bathroom drawer. Get the actual one.

Amazon warning section image — add your image in theme editor

What Actually Happened (Day By Day)

The package showed up on a Friday. Here is exactly what the next four weeks looked like, written from the notes I started keeping the second day because I did not trust my own memory.

I swiped it under both eyes after my shower. It absorbed in about eight seconds, the way the website said it would. There was no sting. There was no greasy film. I put on concealer over it about a minute later and it went on smoother than usual. That was the only thing I noticed on Day 1, and I almost did not write it down because I thought I was imagining it.

The morning puffiness was visibly less. Not gone. Less. I noticed it before I noticed anything else, the way you notice a chair has been moved an inch in a familiar room. I checked twice in different lighting. It was real.

The crepey texture under my smile was softer. I could feel it under my finger when I tested it, the way you test a bruise. The skin felt like skin again instead of tissue paper.

My husband walked into the kitchen, looked at me for about three seconds longer than usual, and said "what are you doing differently?" I said "nothing." He said "you look rested." That was the day I cried into my coffee.

The dark circles I had carried since I was 51 were visibly lighter. Not gone. Lighter. I caught myself looking at my reflection in the toaster instead of glancing at it and looking away. Old habit. New face.

A photograph. My granddaughter's birthday. She is six. She made me sit next to her in the picture and I did not angle my face away from the camera, and I did not ask my daughter to delete it later, and the photograph is now framed on the wall above the kitchen sink. It is the first picture of myself I have framed in nine years.

That is what twenty-eight days of one Korean balm did. I am not promising you the same thing. I am telling you what happened to me.

Timeline section image — add your image in theme editor

My Honest Bottom Line (And What I Would Tell You If We Were Sitting At My Kitchen Table)

Image placeholder

I am 56 years old. I am not a beauty influencer. I am not paid to write this. I am a retired fourth grade teacher in Cleveland who spent nine years buying eye creams that did not work, and then in February of this year I found one that did, and I have been telling every woman I know about it for two months because I do not want anyone else to lose nine years the way I did.

That is the entire reason this letter exists.

Here is what you need to know about the offer if you decide to try it.

Margaret's Rating: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ — 5 out of 5

The honest truth. I have been keeping the framed photograph on my kitchen wall for two weeks now and I look at it every morning while the coffee brews. I have not deleted a single photo of myself since the granddaughter's birthday. I am back at book club, including the one at Linda's house with the brutal overhead lighting. The under-eye balm is the only thing in my routine that changed.

The Offer

The brand is currently running a Buy 1 Get 1 Free promotion. Right now, today, as I am writing this, you get two tubes for $34.95. That works out to about fifteen dollars per tube, which is less than half what I was paying for the cheap drugstore creams that did nothing for nine years, and roughly an eighth of what I was paying for La Mer.

They also include a $10 store credit with every order, free shipping over $50, and a 30-day money-back guarantee on the entire purchase. The guarantee covers the empty tube. You can use the entire thing for thirty days, decide it did nothing for you, send back the empty container, and get every dollar back. No forms. No "let us review your case." I checked this myself before I ordered because I have been burned by guarantees that came with fine print.

What I Want You To Do Right Now

Click the button below this letter. It will take you to the page where you can order the BOGO. The page itself is short and the checkout is fast. The whole thing will take you less than four minutes, which is less time than I spent every morning trying to fix my under-eyes with concealer that did not work.

The current batch is on pre-order for the April 30 restock. The previous batch sold out in eleven days. If you wait until next week to think about it, the BOGO may not be there.

I would not put this in writing if I did not believe it.

P.S.

If you have a friend, a sister, a mother, or a daughter over 45 who has spent the last few years quietly hating her under-eyes, order the second tube for her. The BOGO makes it free. I sent my second tube to my college roommate in Pittsburgh. She is 57 and she texted me last week with one sentence. "Margaret. What is this. Send me three more." That is the kind of message you want from a friend.

— Margaret


This is an advertisement and not an actual news article, blog, or consumer protection update.

The story depicted on this page and the person depicted in the story are based on real customer experiences with the Luxe Korean Under-Eye Balm. Margaret T. is a verified customer who has consented to her name and story being used in this letter. The day-by-day timeline and individual results described are her own. Individual results vary. The results portrayed in this letter and in any customer comments are illustrative and may not be the results that you achieve with this product.

This page may receive compensation for clicks on or purchases of products featured. The owner of this site has a monetary connection to Luxe Cosmetics LLC and the products and services advertised. The owner receives payment whenever a qualified lead is referred or a purchase is made.

Statements regarding the four-driver model of under-eye aging, the Adenosine Wrinkle-Core Complex, individual ingredient mechanisms, and the Korean MFDS regulatory recognition of adenosine reflect publicly available information from peer-reviewed cosmetic science literature and Korean regulatory documentation. These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. The Luxe Korean Under-Eye Balm is a cosmetic product and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

All trademarks referenced (including La Mer, Lancôme, RoC, Estée Lauder, Sephora, Ulta, and Amazon) are the property of their respective owners. References to these brands are made for comparative editorial purposes and do not imply any partnership, endorsement, or affiliation.

The 30-day money-back guarantee, BOGO promotion pricing, $10 store credit, and shipping terms are subject to the current offer terms posted on the Luxe Cosmetics website at the time of purchase. Promotion details may change without notice.

© 2026 Luxe Cosmetics LLC. All rights reserved.


Comments (147)

Sort by: Top Comments ▾
P
Patricia Whitman 2 days ago
Margaret, thank you for writing this. I'm 53 and I have been doing the exact same morning concealer routine you described and I literally said out loud "she's describing my Tuesday" while reading. Ordered the BOGO five minutes ago. I'll come back and report. 🙏
· Reply · 14 Replies
M
Margaret T. (article author) 2 days ago
Patricia, please do come back. I want to hear how it goes. And it's going to feel like nothing is happening for the first 3-4 days. Stick with it.
👍 92 · Reply
S
Susan Marchetti 1 day ago
Patricia I'm 51 and ordered last week, day 6 today and the puffiness in my mornings is already noticeably less. Don't give up if you don't see anything in week 1, mine started showing on day 5/6.
👍 64 · Reply
P
Patricia Whitman 18 hours ago
Susan thank you!! Tube arriving Friday. I'll report back.
👍 28 · Reply
D
Donna Ashford-Klein 4 days ago
Ok so I have to be honest because I promised myself I would stop buying eye creams after my last $90 disaster from Sephora that did NOTHING. I read this whole article. I closed the tab. I went and made dinner. I came back to the article 3 hours later. I read it AGAIN. Then I ordered. I am 58 and I am tired of being tired-looking. Praying this is the one. 🤞🤞🤞
· Reply · 23 Replies
L
Linda Brennan 4 days ago
Donna I did the exact same thing!! Read it, closed it, went back, ordered. The "you're paying $180 for the lid" line about La Mer absolutely destroyed me because I HAVE that jar in my drawer right now 😭
👍 156 · Reply
D
Donna Ashford-Klein 3 days ago
Linda 😂😭 same. Mine is half full and I'm going to use it up out of pure spite at this point.
👍 89 · Reply
M
Margaret T. (article author) 3 days ago
Donna, I read you. The reason I wrote this is because I needed someone to write it for ME two years ago. Let me know how day 11 goes for you.
👍 102 · Reply
K
Karen Petrov 6 days ago
I'm a retired RN, 61 years old, and I want to add something the article didn't go into. The argan oil + bisabolol combination really is the most well-tolerated thing I've found for menopausal skin. I've been recommending bisabolol-based products to friends for years but I had no idea anyone was putting it together with adenosine. Just ordered.
· Reply · 8 Replies
H
Helen Forsythe 5 days ago
Karen this is so reassuring to hear from a nurse, thank you. Just placed my order.
👍 47 · Reply
B
Beverly J. 1 week ago
DAY 11 UPDATE: I ordered after reading this article last week and today my coworker asked me if I was on vacation. I haven't been on vacation. I just put this stuff under my eyes for 11 days. Margaret you weren't kidding. I am not deleting this comment because I want other women on the fence to see this. 🙌
· Reply · 31 Replies
M
Margaret T. (article author) 1 week ago
Beverly. This made me tear up at my kitchen table. Welcome to the other side. ❤️
👍 247 · Reply
C
Cheryl Anders 6 days ago
Beverly this is the comment that made me click buy. Thank you for coming back to update.
👍 118 · Reply
M
Marie K. 5 days ago
Same here. I scrolled the comments first before deciding and yours sealed it for me.
👍 76 · Reply
Y
Yvonne Tellechea 3 days ago
Quick question for anyone who's tried it — does it really not sting? I have rosacea around my eyes and literally everything burns me. Even the "sensitive skin" stuff from drugstore brands. I want to try this so badly but I've been burned (literally) too many times.
· Reply · 12 Replies
M
Marian Hopper 3 days ago
Yvonne — rosacea here too, 56. It does not sting. I was terrified to try it because I have given up on so many things. Day 1 I held my breath waiting for the burn and it never came. Just try it, the guarantee is real, I checked the policy myself.
👍 89 · Reply
Y
Yvonne Tellechea 3 days ago
Marian thank you. Ordering now. 🙏
👍 31 · Reply
M
Margaret T. (article author) 2 days ago
Yvonne, the bisabolol is specifically why this works on reactive skin. Marian is right. The guarantee is real and I tested it (didn't need to use it but I called the company beforehand to verify). You're safe to try it.
👍 67 · Reply
J
Joyce R. 5 days ago
I bought this 3 weeks ago and just placed my reorder today. I am 49 and I have already gifted one of my BOGO tubes to my mother who is 72 and her skin is even more reactive than mine. We are both reordering. Margaret if you read this, my mom wants me to tell you thank you. She hasn't put on concealer in 8 days and she said she "feels like a person again." That was her exact phrase.
· Reply · 17 Replies
M
Margaret T. (article author) 4 days ago
Joyce, please tell your mother that "feels like a person again" is exactly the phrase I would have used and it made my whole morning. ❤️
👍 184 · Reply
C
Christine Vail 1 week ago
I'm going to be the skeptical voice here because I think it's important. I bought this BOGO 18 days ago. It is not a miracle. Day 1-3 I felt nothing. Day 4-7 I noticed a small change in puffiness, that's it. Day 8-12 the dark circles started looking lighter. Day 13-17 the texture got noticeably smoother. Today is day 18 and yes, my under eyes look better than they have in years. But it took TWO AND A HALF WEEKS to get convincing and if I had given up at day 5 I would have missed it. So my advice to anyone reading this — order it, but commit to using it for at least 20 days before you decide if it works. The article is honest about the timeline but a lot of us are impatient. Don't be impatient.
· Reply · 42 Replies
M
Margaret T. (article author) 1 week ago
Christine, this might be the most useful comment in this whole thread. Thank you for being honest and patient. The dermal collagen response really is on a 14-21 day curve and you described it perfectly. I'm pinning this comment.
👍 412 · Reply
R
Rita Goldfarb 6 days ago
Christine thank you for posting the realistic timeline. I needed this. Ordering with realistic expectations.
👍 156 · Reply
P
Patty Mensa 5 days ago
100% agree. I'm on day 22 and the difference between day 10 me and day 22 me is huge. Patience is the move.
👍 87 · Reply
M
Margaret T. (article author) · 📌 Pinned by author 2 days ago
Hi everyone — I wasn't expecting this many comments. I'm reading every single one. A few quick things since I keep seeing the same questions: 1. Yes, the BOGO is real and yes, the guarantee is real. I checked both myself before I ordered. 2. Give it 14 days minimum before you decide. The collagen response takes time and most of you will see real change between day 10 and day 18. 3. If you have severe sensitivity (rosacea, post-retinol damage, perimenopausal reactivity), this is the one that won't sting. I promise. 4. To the women who came back to update with their day 11 results — thank you. You are doing more for other women on the fence than I ever could from one article. I'll keep checking in on this thread. — Margaret 💛
· Reply · 89 Replies